A tiny medieval artefact with a big story

Smaller than a five pence coin, the smallest dragon resides in the London Museum collection. An object of fascination, almost nothing is known about it, aside from that it was made and used in medieval London. It’s so small that the easiest way to hold it is with tweezers.

Intended to be used as a belt mount, it would have been attached to a belt by a rivet as an aesthetic embellishment. Medieval expert Dr Annemarieke Willemsen describes these mounts as the “bling bling” of medieval times.

A small carved animal figure is held by tweezers, with an unfocused human eye in the background.

Our dragon is so small that the easiest way to hold it is with tweezers.

Medieval belt mounts as fashion accessories

They were used as dress accessories and came in a variety of shapes and styles, from circles and rectangles to animals or flowers. Belt-mounts were worn by anyone from princes to peasants in the 14th to 15th centuries. There is an example of a belt in the London Collection with its decorative copper alloy mounts or studs still attached.

Wyverns and their symbolism in medieval Britain

Our mount depicts a roaring wyvern, a legendary winged creature with open jaws, two legs and a curled tail. Wyverns were regarded as powerful and fearsome monsters, and many are found in medieval coats of arms. They represented pestilence and destruction, appearing in illuminated manuscripts. There is a great 14th-century example in the British Library collection showing people worshipping the dragon.

Close-up of an ancient, rusted metal artifact resembling a stylized animal head, isolated against a white background.

Medieval laws on clothing and status

Medieval dress was linked to social status. Mounts made of gold and silver were expensive and made for the elite, much like wearing a Rolex today. Others (like our dragon, and scores of others in the museum) were made of cheaper copper or lead alloys.

Cheap and mass-produced in batches of many at a time, they were within the reach of large swathes of medieval society. Unlike today, medieval laws regulated what clothes people could wear. Sumptuary laws ordained that those “below the estate of knight” were not to wear “cloth of gold, silk or silver, or any manner of embroidered clothing, ring, brooch, clasp of gold, ribbon, belt or any other apparel or attire of gold or silver, or any precious stones”.

How second-hand markets bypassed fashion laws

Such laws were intended to curb excessive expenditure and to maintain a rigid framework of class-based dress. Ultimately ineffective, these laws could be avoided by paying fines.

A second-hand clothes market was also subversive. Existing at the margins of society, fripperers (used clothing dealers) enabled London’s citizens to procure clothing and accessories, cast off from their social superiors.

An antique ornate sword with an embellished, golden hilt against a plain blue background.

The dragon mount would have been used on a belt like this.

The rise of cheap mass-produced accessories

Cheap doesn’t necessarily mean simple. Inexpensive mounts were made of base metals but in different shapes. Copper alloy was commonly used in England, lead-based mounts were more popular on the continent. Londoners were demanding cheaper goods, which resulted in a shift towards lead alloy mounts, while the rest of the country still favoured copper alloy mounts.

We can see a distinct ‘London look’ during the later 14th century, which replicated popular European styles. In medieval London, ‘fashion’ was emerging as individuals desired an ever-changing appearance.

Ancient bronze figurine with a hole in the torso, isolated on a white background.

Interestingly, attempts were made to outlaw lead alloy mounts. The Worshipful Company of Girdlers prohibited mounts made of ‘inferior metals’. The 1327 charter granted to the company outlined that “no man of the said trade should cause any girdle of silk, of wool, of leather, or of linen thread, to be garnished with any inferior metal than with latten, copper, iron, and steel”.

This ‘false work’ included ‘lead, pewter, and tin, and other false things’. Those who disregarded this were punished through extortionate fines and their ‘false work’ burnt. Fines ranged from 40 pence (10 day’s wages for a labourer) to, after several repeated offences, 20 shillings.

Why this tiny dragon still matters today

Thus, though physically small, the smallest dragon in London has outsize historical importance. It’s a historical stepping stone, allowing us to examine wider changes in ‘fashion’ and fashionable dress in medieval London.



Matthew Russell is a student at Queen Mary University of London. In October 2018, students from Queen Mary University of London visited London Museum as part of their undergraduate course ‘Beer, Books and Longbows: The World of Medieval Objects’, taught by Dr Eyal Poleg, Senior Lecturer in Material History. Curator Meriel Jeater presented them with 25 medieval objects from the stores about which little research had been done. Students chose their favourite artefact, researched it and wrote a detailed essay, exploring what it revealed about medieval life. This is one of the essays.